Love, As Always, Pete

The Weekly Letters, by A. Pedersen Wood

August 5, 1994

Dear Everyone:

For years now we've been trying to get people to release boxes of old records for destruction, partly because it's good records management practice, and partly because, if we didn't destroy at least as many boxes as come in each year, the Records Centers would burst at the seams.  And for years, as soon as anyone would release a box, the “Tiddly” Department would slap a "hold" on it to prevent it from being destroyed.  This was because there were so many "open tax years" that Company was wrangling over with the IRS. 

This would lead to frustration.  People wanted to know why they should pay to store boxes that they didn't need just because the “Tiddly” Department wanted them held.  And if they had to keep them, why couldn't “Tiddly” pay the storage costs? 

And, for years, the “Tiddly” Department declined to pay for boxes that they were holding.  Until a few months ago, when “Tiddly” did an abrupt about-face and said, "Why, sure we’ll pick up the storage costs on boxes that are only being held for “Tiddly” purposes."  As long as the records in the boxes were at least four years old (your average tax audit takes about 3+ years).  And as long as the charges didn't start coming to “Tiddly” until the second half of the year. 

Last month, we "threw the switch" on a program that divergent the charges on qualifying boxes from the Owner to “Tiddly”. 

Yesterday, “Tiddly” announced that they had "resolved" a number of issues with the IRS and would be closing all tax years up through 1987.  Think they knew about this upcoming agreement with "the Service", as they call it, when “Tiddly” agreed to start paying for boxes? 

How does all this affect me?  It meant that I had to drop everything, Versatile included, and start running Ad Hoc reports out of CRMIS to find out how many boxes could potentially be destroyed.  Quite a few. 

And how much is it costing Company to "settle" the tax issues?  Quite a lot.  But it will save a fortune in the future. 

In other news… 

No movie last weekend, due to getting our hair cut.  So will move directly onto my list of videos. 

At one point, I wandered into the "Epic Section" (I didn't even know there was such a thing as the Epic Section), which could also be called "the Charlton Heston sub-Section" since the Big Guy was in every third film there.  I picked out Lady Jane, which is a fairly romantic version of the young woman who became Queen of England for nine days.  Lady Jane was the granddaughter of Mary Tudor Brandon, sister of Henry VIII.  When it became clear that Henry's son, Edward VI, was not going to live much longer, Jane’s parents saw a chance to become the power behind the throne and grabbed at it with both hands, forcing her into an unwanted marriage to gain the political support they needed. 

Edward duly dies and Jane is pushed onto the throne, even though she knows that her cousin, Mary, is the real heir.  Imagine her parents’ chagrin when, scepter in hand, Jane suddenly realizes that now they have to obey her.  There's nothing like placing an idealistic 16-year-old with raging hormones (and a religious fanatic to boot) in charge of the country to put a new perspective on things. 

The sets and costumes are magnificent and the acting stands up to them.  If you know your history, you know it doesn't have a happy ending. 

Gleaming the Cube.  This is what happens when you pick something out of the "Action/Adventure" section virtually at random.  Teenager believes that the Universe revolves around his skateboard until someone close to him suddenly dies and he feels compelled to find out why.  Christian Slater does the dialogue and close-ups while a real skateboarder does the more spectacular acrobatics.  Their appearance is much the same, due in large part to the hair, which looks as if the stylist covered the actor’s head with mousse, then quickly grabbed his finger and shoved it into an open light socket. 

The plot has lots of holes in it; or, in this case, potholes.  Like, if we can hear the skateboard clackety-clacking over the seams in the sidewalk, why can't the security guards?  Not that it matters.  The whole point is to get to the finale which involves one desperate bad guy, a stolen police car, a freeway, many kids on skateboards, a pizza truck, a sports car, a big-rig, and an airport, and the firm belief that people under the age of 18 are naturally exempt from the laws of gravity. 

Movies I have absolutely no intention of seeing, due to the complete obnoxiousness of the advertisements: 

Airheads.  The title says it all. 

Blankman.  Black exploitation "comedy" that trivializes violence against women.  And that's just the trailer. 

The Mask.  Too disgusting for words. 

North.  Spoiled brat demands life guarantee him perfect parents.  What's next, automatic ‘A’s in school?  I'm just glad that this one is out so I don't have to see the trailers for it anymore. 

If you're interested in any of these, you're on your own. 

Love, as always, 

 

Pete

Previous   Next