Love, As Always, Pete

The Weekly Letters, by A. Pedersen Wood

August 14, 1992

Dear Everyone:

This week has been very q-u-i-e-t (never say the word out loud or the gremlins will hear you and make all the phones ring at once), partly because several people are off on vacation and the manager has disappeared on us, and partly in comparison to last week's "Drop-Everything-and-Take-Care-of-This" Crisis du Jour. 

Last week's crisis dealt with the Corporate Staff Study (Records Management is part of Administration and Services, which is part of “Domination”, which is part of Corporate Staff).  The Study is to determine which jobs to keep and which to axe.  That's pretty much it, in a nutshell. 

There is an outside consulting firm which is going to produce a Survey next Monday to help determine what's essential, what's necessary and what's luxury.  These are the same people who recommended to Company USA that they cut 8500 jobs, which they are in the process of doing right now.  This does not bode well for those of us who might fall into the "luxury" category. 

Last week's Crisis pertain to this Survey.  We found out Tuesday afternoon that we had until 9:00 AM Friday (which really meant by Thursday night) to come up with:  How much money we spent in 1991; what we spend it on; and who we would charge it back to if we charged-back, which we don't do now, but which we undoubtedly will do in the future, if we still exist after The Study. 

Part 1 was easy.  How much did we spend in 1991?  $1,200,000.  That was a given. “Crow”, our manager, gave it to us.  That's not to say that he gave us the money; he gave us the figure.  It's part of a manager’s job to know how much money he's already spent. 

Part 2 was a little more difficult.  “Crow” and the other manager-types on the Study Sub-Team for Admin & Services (this is where he's disappeared to) had already come up with what they thought would be the major breakdowns, like Retention Schedule Development, Active Files Consultation and the like.  It was our job to refine the terminology and come up with percentages. 

For instance, what percent of the total cost of all the people in Records Management (including salaries, rent, benefits, travel, etc.) was spent on developing Retention Schedules?  What percent went towards our computer systems, including the time I spend keeping them going? 

This wasn't so easy, although I had an edge over most of my co-workers.  I saw the handwriting on the wall a couple of years ago and started keeping a daily job log.  Nothing fancy, just a graph with broad categories across the top, like Destruction, Schedules, Computer, and the times, in 15-minute increments, down the side.  Mostly for my own information and for those times when a manager suddenly asks, "just how many hours per week are we spending on (fill-in-the-blank)?" 

Once we had the terminology and percentages, then we had to do Part 3:  How much of the $1.2 million would have been charged back to whom?  In other words:  How much of the total time you spent working on Retention Schedules last year was spent on any one particular customer? 

(Hey, no problem! I  have those figures right here in my purse.  Look at it this way:  How much time did you spend in 1991, washing your hair?) 

We started working on Part 3 Thursday morning at 10:00.  (Actually, that's when we got together for the meeting.  I'd been working on compiling figures since the day before.)  We ordered pizza in for lunch.  And we kept churning out mostly-imaginary numbers until about 7:00. 

Needless to say, this bumped all other projects onto the back burners.  I finally got back together with my little Destruction Process Improvement Team yesterday.  Last week's scheduled meeting was called on account of Crisis. 

On the plus side, this gave our customers another week to complete and send back the surveys that we had sent out just before I went on vacation.  Out of 86 sent out, at least 51 have come back.  That's a response rate of 59+%.  Since the other Records Management Team (the one working on improving Active Files Consultation) claimed that their response rate (43.5%) was "very high", I guess ours can be considered "very, very high".  Which just goes to show the value of plugging little "Ziggy" cartoons into your survey. 

Not that we expect to see any cute cartoons in the Study Survey, which will come out next Monday.  Since responding is mandatory, they expect the rate to be 100%.  When the CEO tells you to fill out a Survey, you do it. 

Movie review:  “Jeannie” and I went last week to see Whispers in the Dark.  A so-so murder mystery with a psychiatrist who doesn't have an affair with her patient.  Instead, she begins to suspect that she's having an affair with her patient's boyfriend.  Then, she begins to suspect that she's having an affair with her patient's murderer.  It's all rather slow and dull (at one point, “Jeannie” leaned over and asked when’s our next haircut appointment) until the last 10 minutes, at which point the movie proceeds to bring new depth and meaning to the word ludicrous.  People were rolling in the aisles, they were laughing so hard.  Except for that, it's not with the price of the popcorn.  Save your money. 

Love, as always, 

 

Pete

Previous   Next