Love, As Always, Pete

The Weekly Letters, by A. Pedersen Wood

September 10, 1992

Dear Everyone:

Raging controversy going on here in The City over the recent police crackdown.  What are they cracking down on?  Drug dealers?  Muggers?  Bank robbers?  Overly-aggressive panhandlers?  No. 

Jaywalkers. 

That's right.  A vicious ring of jaywalkers, right here in San Francisco.  So there was San Francisco's finest, risking life and limb, handing out $55 "moving violations" to people crossing the street.  Lots of them.  With reporters and camera persons in tow to catch it all for the evening news and morning paper. 

Why?  The police chief says it's because "fully 50% of vehicle-pedestrian accidents are the fault of the pedestrian".  What this means, of course, is that half of the accidents involving pedestrians and cars are caused by the drivers of the cars.  Why don't the police go after them?  Simple.  Pedestrians are easier to catch. 

But the people being handed the tickets aren't even involved in accidents.  They are just crossing the street.  Against the light, or in the middle of the block, true; but they aren't causing any accidents, they're just crossing the streets. 

The police chief (whose name, currently, is MUD), says that this measure is to "educate" the populace.  The $55 fine is the tuition for this unsolicited education. 

And where is all this going on?  In the neighborhoods, teaching little kiddies to look for the crosswalks?  No.  South of Mission, where people don't quite know which planet they're on, much less what the difference is between a sidewalk and the street?  No. 

In the Financial District.  Only in the Financial District. 

Why?  Two reasons. 

Reason Number One:  There are a lot of people in the Financial District who cross the streets.  And they don't even think of it as "crossing the street"; they think of it as "getting from one office to another".  Example:  Suppose I have a meeting with “Shelley” in “Administrative Nonsense” Billing.  (We still need to get that pesky California State Sales Tax for Supplies billing thing squared away.)  To get to “Shelley's” office, I leave my office on the 30th  Floor at “575 Mirabel” Street and go to “Shelley's” office on the 2nd Floor at “225 Beelzebub” Street. 

I have to cross “Mirabel” Street and Sutter-at-Sansome in order to get from here to there.  Now, no one in their right mind crosses “Mirabel” Street against the light (except for bicycle messengers who regularly defy the laws of gravity so what chance does a City ordinance have?) in the middle of the day.  Those bus drivers are out for blood. 

But the corner of Sutter, Sansome and “Mirabel” is something different.  For one thing, there are so many double-parked trucks the cars often can't get through.  And even when it's clear, about the only automobiles that head up that way are taxis; and they won't hit you because they don't want to have to stop and fill out all those forms.  So you watch for oncoming cars and, when there aren't any, you go ahead and cross the street.  Simple. 

And that's the way it is in most of the Financial District.  You look and, if there are no cars coming, you cross the street.  You're a busy person.  You don't have time to stand on the corner, waiting for a little electronic man to signal you that it's okay to cross.  You can figure that out for yourself. 

So if these people aren't causing accidents and are just going about their daily business, why are they getting hit with these $55 tickets? 

Reason Number Two:  They can afford to pay the fines. 

Panhandlers can't pay fines. 

Drug dealers won't pay fines. 

Business people in suits can and do pay fines. 

"Squeezing the suits!" is the cry of angry columnists and many irate letters to the editors.  This is just one more method of "revenue enhancement" at the expense of the corporations who are leaving the City in droves.  Although I don't know about that last one.  I can't remember ever hearing of a corporate executive saying, "I am moving my company to the East Bay because I'm tired of getting jaywalking tickets."  I think it has more to do with the tax structure and building permits and other forms of revenue enhancement. 

And, no, I wasn't caught jaywalking and I didn't get a ticket. 

Knock on wood. 

Love, as always, 

 

Pete

Previous   Next